重庆丰都岩溶区植烟土壤肥力特征及综合评价研究

兰木羚; 高 明

重庆丰都岩溶区植烟土壤肥力特征及综合评价研究

兰木羚,
高明

西南大学资源环境学院/重庆市三峡库区农业面源污染控制研究中心

基金项目: 国家十二五科技支撑项目（2012BAD141318）

计量
- 文章访问数: 1967
- HTML浏览量: 278
- PDF下载量: 1582
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-01-17
- 发布日期: 2014-06-25

Study on characteristics and comprehensive evaluation of the fertility of tobacco cultivated soil in Fengdu karst area,Chongqing

College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University / Research Center for Agricultural Non-point source Pollation Control in the Three Gorges Reservoir of Chongqing

摘要

摘要: 以重庆市丰都县植烟区石灰岩土壤为研究对象，通过野外调查采样和室内分析方法，并采用主成分分析法和模糊数学隶属度函数模型估算出土壤适宜性指数（SFI），进而对土壤养分状况进行综合评价。结果表明：（1）该岩溶区植烟土壤pH多呈弱酸性至中性，有23.08 %的土壤样品pH低于5.00，这些土壤酸化问题较为突出；（2）有机质和氮含量丰富，78.85 %的土样有机质含量处在植烟所需的最适宜范围（15～30 g/kg）内，全部土样的碱解氮含量均在植烟所需的适宜范围（65～100 mg/kg）内，且变异系数仅为0.92 %；（3）土壤全磷表现出中至高含量水平（＞0.6 g/kg），但土壤有效磷供应不足，20.93 %土样有效磷含量处在缺乏水平（＜10 mg/kg）以下；（4）土壤钾元素供应充足，全钾含量全部处于丰富或极丰富水平（＞25 g/kg），超过81.84 %土样其速效钾含量处于植烟所需的适宜范围(＞150 mg/kg)内；（5）该岩溶区土壤肥力整体水平不高，仅15.38 %土样的综合肥力为较高水平（0.70＞SFI≥0.60)，57.69 %为中低等水平（0.60＞SFI≥0.40)，26.93 %为低水平(SFI≤0.40)，这与岩溶地区土壤贫瘠且侵蚀退化严重、施肥不合理等因素有关。为此，建议科学耕作，抑制土壤侵蚀退化，同时通过撒施生石灰等调节土壤pH，并适当提高复合肥中磷素比例。
- 岩溶地区 /
- 植烟土壤 /
- 肥力评价 /
- 重庆丰都
Abstract: The fertility of limestone soil cultivated with tobacco in karst areas of Fengdu county, Chongqing was studied through field sampling and lab analysis. Methods of principal component analysis and membership function of fuzzy mathematics were used to estimate soil fertility by means of estimating SFI(Soil Feasibility Index). The results showed that: (1) The soil in the area was weakly acidic to neutral. 23.08 % of soil samples had pH less than 5.00, thus there are obvious soil acidification problems in the region. (2) The soil was rich in organic matter and nitrogen. 78.85 % of the soil samples had OM content in the optimum range for planting tobacco (15～30 g/kg). All soil samples had available nitrogen content in a suitable range for planting tobacco (65～100 mg/kg) with a coefficient of variation of only 0.92 %. (3) Total phosphorus content was medium to high (>0.6 g/kg), but there was insufficient supply of available phosphorus in the soil. Phosphorus was absent (<10 mg/kg) in 20.93 % of the soil samples. (4) The soil had an adequate supply of potassium. All samples had rich or extremely rich total potassium content (> 25 g/kg). 81.84 % of the soil samples had available potassium content in the proper range for planting tobacco (>150 mg/kg); (5) The area's overall soil fertility level was not high. Only 15.38 % of samples had medium-high soil fertility (0.70>SFI≥0.60), 57.69 % had medium-low fertility (0.60>SFI≥ 0.40), and 26.93 % had low fertility. Obviously the karst areas are affected by factors including soil erosion and severe degradation,and irrational fertilization. Therefore, in karst areas attention should be given to scientific farming, reduction of soil erosion and degradation, the application of lime to regulate soil pH, and proper increase of the ratio of phosphorous in fertilizer.
- karst area /
- tobacco planting soil /
- evaluation of soil fertility /
- Fengdu county of Chongqing City

HTML

参考文献(33)

[1]	袁道先，朱德浩，翁金桃，等.中国岩溶学［M］.北京：地质出版社，1994：1-3.
[2]	杨明德.岩溶峡谷区溶洞发育特征及水动力条件［J］.中国岩溶,1998,17(3)：187-195.
[3]	罗建新,方红,徐小雀,等.湖南土壤生态区烤烟施肥模式优选［J］.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),1997,23(3)：238-243．
[4]	肖汉乾,罗建新,王国宝,等.湖南省植烟土壤养分丰缺状况的分析［J］.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2003，29(2)：150-153.
[5]	任四海,徐辰生,孙敬权,等.土壤养分因子与烤烟品质的关系［J］.安徽农业科学,2004,32(2)： 368-369．
[6]	谢喜珍,熊德中,曾文龙.福建龙岩烟区土壤主要物理化学性状的研究［J］.安徽农业科学,2010,38(27)：14972-14974．
[7]	YANG Yuhong,CHEN Dongmei,JIN Yan,et al.Effect of Different Fertilizers on Functional Diversity of Microbial Flora in Rhizospheric Soil Under Tobacco Monoculture［J］.Acta Agron Sin,2011,37(1)：105-111.
[8]	Valerie Dewaelheyns,Annemie Elsen,Hilde Vandendriessche,et al.Garden management and soil fertility in Flemish domestic gardens［J］.Landscape and Urban Planning,2013,116：25-35.
[9]	Wang Xinzhong,Liu Guoshun,Hu Hongchao,et al.Determination of management zones for a tobacco field based on soil fertility［J］.Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,2009,65(2)：168-175.
[10]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法［M］.北京：中国农业科技出版社,2000：12-31.
[11]	杨剑虹.土壤农化分析与环境监测［M］.北京：中国大地出版社,2008：22-55.
[12]	马强,宇万太,赵少华,等.黑土农田土壤肥力质量综合评价［J］.应用生态学报,2004,15(10)：1916-1920.
[13]	陈星峰, 李娟, 陈朝阳. 南平烟区植烟土壤适宜性的综合评价［J］. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(6)：124-130.
[14]	范国忠, 杨作糜. 现代统计分析方法［M］. 北京：中国统计出版社,1992.
[15]	裴鑫德. 多元统计分析及其应用［M］. 北京：北京农业大学出版社,1991.
[16]	卜兆宏. 主成份分析的简便解算法及其应用［J］. 土壤通报, 1982, 13(4): 29-34,20.
[17]	唐晓平. 四川紫色土肥力的Fuzzy综合评判［J］. 土壤通报, 1997, 28(3）：107-109.
[18]	宋彦君,苏兆俊,彭成林,等.保康县植烟土壤的主要肥力特征初探［J］.湖北农业科学,2003,11(1) ：53-55.
[19]	尹辉,蒋忠诚,杨奇勇,等.典型岩溶区土壤pH值的空间异质性研究［J］.广东农业科学,2013,40(11)：48-51.
[20]	何俊瑜,陈博,陈秀兰,等.贵州铜仁地区主要烟区植烟土壤养分状况［J］.土壤,2012,44 (6)：953-959.
[21]	孙燕,高焕梅,和林涛.土壤有机质及有机肥对烟草品质的影响［J］.安徽农业科学,2007,35(20)：6160-6161.
[22]	马京民,马聪,李彰,等.信阳市不同类型植烟土壤养分现状及平衡施肥［J］.河南农业科学,2003,(10)：38-42.
[23]	宋承鉴,宋月家,周恩肖,等.广西植烟土壤特征分析［J］.中国烟草,1994,(2)：5-9.
[24]	张宜春.植物营养原理［M］.北京:农业出版社,1987：31-45.
[25]	何俊瑜,陈博,陈秀兰,等.贵州铜仁地区主要烟区植烟土壤养分状况［J］.土壤,2012,44 (6)：953-959.
[26]	宋珍霞,高明,关博谦,等.重庆市植烟区土壤肥力特征研究［J］.土壤通报,2005,36(5)：664-668.
[27]	薛超群,王广山,胡晨曦,等.影响烤烟香气的农业因素［J］. 黑龙江烟草,2000,(4)：13-15.
[28]	陈江华,李志宏,刘建利,等.全国主要烟区土壤养分丰缺状况评价［J］.中国烟草学报,2004,10(3)：14-18.
[29]	陈江华,李国安.烤烟生产原理［M］.重庆:科学技术文献出版社,1995：13-22.
[30]	邹加明,单沛祥,李文璧,等.大理烟区土壤肥力现状与演变趋势［J］.中国烟草科学,2002,(4)：35-39.
[31]	罗建新,石丽红,龙世平.湖南主产烟区土壤养分状况与评价［J］.湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,31(4): 376-380.
[32]	胡国松,郑伟,王震东,等.烤烟营养原理［M］.北京：科学出版社,2000：23-30.
[33]	中华人民共和国农业部.NY/T309-1996,全国耕地类型区、耕地地力等级划分［S］.