基于RS和GIS技术的乌江流域生态环境质量现状诊断
Diagnosis of eco-environment quality in Wujiang River watershed based on RS and GIS
-
摘要: 乌江位于云贵高原斜面上,是长江上游南岸最大的支流,地质地貌独特,岩溶地貌广泛发育,由于长期不合理大规模开发利用活动,水土流失严重,石漠化问题突出,生态质量受到重大威胁。本文以乌江流域(位于贵州省境内)41个地区为研究区,以2010年TM遥感影像为主要数据源,运用RS和GIS技术获取景观格局信息,构建乌江流域生态环境质量评价指标体系,采用熵权法与GIS图形叠置法相结合,对研究区生态环境质量状况进行评价,在此基础上,运用系统聚类法划分生态环境质量类型,将乌江流域生态环境质量划分为良好(Ⅰ)、较好(Ⅱ)、一般(Ⅲ)、较差(Ⅳ)4个级别。结果显示:乌江流域生态环境质量属于良好、较好、一般、较差的面积分别为7 710.8 km2、26 208.3 km2、15 704.3 km2、16 106.1 km2,所占比重分别为11.7 %、39.9 %、23.9 %、24.5 %。总体上,流域的西北、西南地区生态环境质量较差,而流域的东北地区生态环境质量较好,不同县区生态环境质量差异显著。Abstract: The Wujiang river watershed lies on the Yunnan-Guizhou plateau slope, is the largest branch of the south bank of the upper Yangtze River, has unique geology and geomorphology and widely developed karst landform. Owing to long-term irrational exploitation and utilization on a large scale, the river watershed is confronted with serious soil and water loss and outstanding desertification problems. By using the TM images of the Wujiang river watershed in 2010 as the main information source, the paper, takes 41 regions (cities, counties and districts) in the Wujiang river watershed (in Guizhou province) as study area, extracts land use information and landscape pattern indexes based on RS and GIS, constructs the evaluation index system of the ecological quality in the Wujiang river watershed, determines the index weight by entropy method, combines with GIS graphic overlay method, evaluates the ecological environment quality situation of the 41 regions. Based on the above works, the ecological quality in the Wujiang river watershed divided into four levels: good(Ⅰ), relatively good(Ⅱ), general(Ⅲ) and poor (Ⅳ). The research result shows that the area of good, relatively good, general and poor ecological environment quality in the Wujiang river watershed in 2010 year is 7 710.8 km2, 26 208.3 km2 15 704.3 km2 and 16 106.1 km2 respectively, and the weight is 11.7 %, 39.9 %, 23.9 % and 24.5 % respectively. On the whole, the ecological environment is of inferior quality in northwest and southwest Wujiang river watershed, but the ecological environment quality is better in the northeast. And the ecological environment quality in different regions has obvious differences.
-
[1] 徐燕,周华荣.初论我国生态环境质量评价研究进展[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(2):166-172. [2] 叶文虎,栾胜基.环境质量评价学[M].高等教育出版社,1994. [3] 李晓秀.北京山区生态环境质量评价体系初探三[J].自然资源,1997 (5):31-35. [4] 夏军.区域水环境及生态环境质量评价:多级关联评估理论与应用[M].武汉水利电力大学出版社,1999. [5] 刘鲁君,叶亚平.县域生态环境质量考评方法研究[J].环境监测管理与技术,2000,12(004):13-17. [6] 国庆喜,王天明.丰林自然保护区景观生态评价:量化与解释[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(5):825-832. [7] 刘哲,张江山,许丽忠,等. 山仔水库周边乡镇生态质量未确知测度评价[J].环境科学与技术,2006(29):56-58. [8] 陈丽华,武建宁,马生全. 甘南州生态质量状况及评价体系的构建[J]. 西北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2006(27):24-26. [9] 段沛霞,倪长健. 生态质量综合评价的投影寻踪动态聚类方法[J].环境研究与监测,2007(1):3-5. [10] 杨光华,包安明,陈曦. 新疆博斯腾湖湿地生态质量的定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009(2):119-124. [11] 李丽纯,潘卫华,陈家金,等. 福建省 2007-2010 年年度生态质量气象评价及其时空分布特征[J]. 中国农业气象2011,32( 增 1) : 55-58. [12] 吴秀芹,蔡运龙,蒙吉军. 塔里木河下游典型区景观生态质量评价[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2003(2):12-17. [13] 苏维词,张贵平.地表起伏对区域发展成本影响浅析——以贵州为例[J].经济研究导刊,2012(6):144-156. [14] 张艳,张志南,黄勇,等. 南黄海冬季小型底栖生物丰度和生物量[J]. 应用生态学报,2007,18(2):411-419. [15] 陈利顶,傅伯杰.黄河三角洲地区人类活动对景观结构的影响分析[J].生态学报,1996,16(4):337-344. [16] 程启月.评测指标权重确定的结构熵权法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010 (7):1225-1228.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2255
- HTML浏览量: 317
- PDF下载量: 1620
- 被引次数: 0